Polymer Chemistry Coursework Assignment
高分子化学代写 No errors in the science and demonstrates a detailed understanding of the key learning outcomes of the course and beyond.
Introduction 高分子化学代写
Polymer chemistry has been much maligned over the last few years with well-publicised examples of the environmental damage that plastic pollution is causing. However, sustainability in polymer science extends beyond plastic waste and there are significant environmental benefits to using plastics over other materials in many applications.
In this piece of coursework, you will assess where polymer science can be advanced to improve its sustainability, or where polymer science can be used to improve the sustainability of another field or application.
To do this you will create a POST note. A POST note is document that is aimed politicians and policy makers that aims to inform them of the current status of an area of science or technology, and how development in this area could enhance society e.g. through health, financial or environmental benefits. A template for your POST note, which also contains further instructions of how to prepare you POST note and links to real examples, is provided on Blackboard.
POST note topics 高分子化学代写
The following is a list of suggested topics. This is not exhaustive and the topics are deliberately broad so that you can choose a smaller topic of your own interest within them. For example, you may wish to focus on the use of polymer composites in aerospace. If there is a topic outside of this list that you would like to write your POST note about then that is ok but I recommend emailing me to check that the topic is appropriate. 高分子化学代写
- mechanical recycling of plastic waste
- chemical recycling of plastic waste
- polymer composites
- biodegradable polymers
POST note requirements 高分子化学代写
The assessment criteria is provided below. Your POST note must be:
- understandable to a non-specialist audience.
- no longer than 3 pages using the provided template.
- evidence-based with appropriate references.
Marking Criteria
Your POST note will be marked on three areas: its scientific content and accuracy (50%), its critical appraisal of the literature (25%), and the style and appearance (25%).
Content |
|
| Approaching perfection (100%) | Completely free from errors in the science and explanations are detailed and convey the topic clearly and simply without the omission of the detail required at Masters level. Concisely covers the content with no omissions. |
| Distinction (80%) | No errors in the science and demonstrates a detailed understanding of the key learning outcomes of the course and beyond. Explanations are plausible and detailed, and convey the complexity of the content in a clear manner. |
| Merit (65%) | Some minor errors in the science but does demonstrate understanding of the key learning outcomes of the course and beyond. Explanations are plausible and reasonably detailed but could be more illuminating. 高分子化学代写 |
| Pass (55%) | Some errors in the science but does demonstrate understanding of the key learning outcomes of the course. Explanations are plausible but simplistic and do not convey the detail required at Masters level. |
| Fail (40%) | Coursework contains significant errors in the science and does not demonstrate understanding of the course material. Explanations are plausible but flawed. |
| Poor fail (20%) | Coursework contains significant and fundamental basic errors in the science. Explanations are implausible. |
| Non-submission (0%) | Coursework not submitted. |
Critical thought |
|
| Approaching perfection (100%) | The coursework proposes genuinely new and innovative ideas that could lead to break throughs in the field. |
| Distinction (80%) | Clear evidence of the student looking well beyond the basic information to make connections between different aspects of the material, forming their own opinions/reflections, distilling and critically evaluating the important data and concepts. |
| Merit (65%) | Evidence of thought beyond the basic information and concepts to synthesise their own analysis but could reasonably show some further depth of thought. Opinions/Reflections not strongly backed up with evidence. 高分子化学代写 |
| Pass (55%) | Evidence of critical thought, but not very extensive or comprehensive. Little connection made between the course content and the literature. |
| Fail (40%) | Very little evidence of thinking or understanding the chemistry. A superficial reiteration of the ideas involved. |
| Poor fail (20%) | Entirely superficial analysis of the material. |
| Non-submission (0%) | Coursework not submitted. |
Style and appearance |
|
| Approaching perfection (100%) | No spelling, grammatical or formatting errors. |
| Distinction (80%) | The work is very well presented, and written in appropriate language throughout with no mistakes that affect immediate comprehension. Figures are clear, used to good effect to aid understanding of the material. The structure enhances the flow of material and concepts, providing proportionate emphasis. References correctly used when appropriate. |
| Merit (65%) | Generally, well written and is readily understood. Some grammatical errors or inappropriate style, but which can be overcome by a second reading. Figures mostly clearly constructed and labelled but scope for improvement with deeper thought. Well structured, with a logical presentation of all the material. References sometimes used but correctly formatted. |
| Pass (55%) | Writing is understandable with some effort, but with noticeable errors and inappropriate writing style in places. Figures not effectively used, and add only basic information to the text. Sensibly structured, but areas for improvement in the presentation of the material. References sometimes used, but poorly or incorrectly formatted. 高分子化学代写 |
| Fail (40%) | Poor use of language throughout, and written in a style which makes it difficult to understand the work. Figures poor quality and difficult to interpret. Poorly organised. No referencing beyond that provided in the assignment. No references given. |
| Poor fail (20%) | Coursework is disorganised and barely comprehensible. Figures are of very poor quality. |
| Non-submission (0%) | Coursework not submitted. |
更多代写：美国物理网课代上 托福代考 留学生PSY心理学代写 英国Essay代写范文 批判论文代写 统计网课代修价格
